Kerry-Lugar Bill (Urdu Version)

Posted on Updated on

ObamaZardari

— I obedient sir —

karry-logar-bill_01karry-logar-bill_02karry-logar-bill_03karry-logar-bill_04

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Kerry-Lugar Bill (Urdu Version)

    Najam said:
    October 19, 2009 at 22:42

    I didn’t find anything wrong in this bill. If we follow it in a correct way, we can start many education and health projects in NWFP right away.

      Ans responded:
      October 20, 2009 at 03:35

      what do you say about my post “کیری لوگر بل کی متنازعہ شرائط”
      did you read them all?

    Najam said:
    October 20, 2009 at 04:05

    This one? If yes? Yeah, I have all the points and didn’t find any thing wrong. In fact, we have developed one habit very bad in ourselves that we are never thankful to our donors, we never use aid in a right way now first army is not getting this aid thats why they had a problem with it.

    Otherwise, as per our constitution our civil govt can overrides army rules but it neva happened. If it was happened, we were never in the current situation. We were strong enough politically but Army always destroy us.

      Ans responded:
      October 20, 2009 at 14:29

      – we are never thankful to our donors.
      do we need donors?
      – We were strong enough politically..
      were we … really?? when? in which era? in 1956 when a paralyzed Ghulam Mohammad dismissed the assembly … or when an uniformed person was sitting in our assembly as minister of defense named ayub khan … or when we have a long era of ayub and then yahya .. and then zia and musharraf .. and in between a war of political parties .. when we were strong politically …

    Najam said:
    October 20, 2009 at 14:31

    Im saying if Army didn’t destroy us, if were politically strong.

    Najam said:
    October 20, 2009 at 14:33

    Since our birth we are running our country on aid. Quaid e Azam was the first who asked for 2BN Dollars aid from US… U can verify from the historian as well.

    Why we are still running on aids because we didn’t fininsh our feudal system but India did at their independence.

      Ans responded:
      October 20, 2009 at 14:56

      exactly … agree with you

    Qamar said:
    October 24, 2009 at 10:40

    I do not agree to accept as a sovereign citizen of Pakistan. We shall remove those kind of people from the power.

    AHMAD ASLAM said:
    October 28, 2009 at 05:31

    ITS JUST OUR POLITICIANS MADE THIS BILL “MATNAZA” THERE IS NOTHING IN THIS BILL THAT WE CAN BE ASHAMED. AND FIRST TIME THEY ARE TRYING TO PUT THE RIGHT THINGS I MEAN RULE OF LAW AND MANY GOOD THINGS FOR DEMOCRACY. SO I FULLY AGREE WITH THIS BILL AND THE MAIN POINT IS IM THE STUDENT OF LAW PUGC. MANY PPL KNOW THERE IS NO SANCTION BEHIND INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NO BODY CAN PUNICH IF WE VOILATE ANY INTERNATIONAL LAW SO IF WE DONT AGREE WITH THESE CONDITIONS THEY ONLY CAN STOP GIVEING US MONEY AND NOTHING ELSE CAN THEY DO… OR ELSE THEY WILL STOP OUR FUNDS …ONE MORE LITTLE THING WHEN YOU GO TO BANK FOR LOAD THEY IMPOSE SOME SORT OF CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS. ALTHOUGH ITS NOT A LOAN ITS HELPFUL FUNDING TO MAKE OUR CIVIL SOCITETY MORE BETTER AND ONE THING MORE US. AID WILL DISTRIBUTE TO THE CIVIL SOCIETY AND N.G.OS AND NOT TO THE GOVT. BECAUSE THEY WATCHING OUR CORRUPTION RATES AND ALL THAT SO FINALLY I THINK THIS IS BEST FOR DEMOCRACY AND AS WELL AS FOR PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN. POLITICIANS IF DONT RAISE OBJECTTION WHO WILL SAY THEM POLITICISN NO MATERR IF THEY ARE WRONG OR RIGHT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s